From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Arbitration Btwn. F.X. Caprara Auto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1492) CA 01-00817.

November 9, 2001.

(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J. — Arbitration.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Petitioner appeals from an order dismissing its petition brought pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award. Petitioner failed to submit a complete record of the arbitration proceedings, and thus we are unable to review petitioner's contentions on appeal concerning the propriety of the award ( see generally, Chazy Westport Tel. Corp. v. KFC-Kuntz for Congress, 276 A.D.2d 872). Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent's counterclaim for attorney's fees ( see, General Business Law § 198-b [f] [5]).


Summaries of

In re Arbitration Btwn. F.X. Caprara Auto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re Arbitration Btwn. F.X. Caprara Auto

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN F.X. CAPRARA AUTO SALES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 9, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

Matter of the Arbitration Between Spasiano

Thus, public policy does not preclude enforcement of the award (see Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v.…

In the Matter of City of Buffalo

We conclude that Supreme Court correctly denied the petition. Ordinarily, the mere failure to submit a…