From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.N.M.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 17, 2013
No. 04-13-00129-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2013)

Summary

acknowledging all of court's attempts to contact the appellant by mail were returned as "undeliverable"

Summary of this case from In re E.L.M.H.

Opinion

No. 04-13-00129-CV

07-17-2013

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.M. and E.X.M.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-02616

The Honorable Richard Garcia, Associate Judge Presiding

The Honorable Richard Garcia, Associate Judge, Bexar County, Texas, signed the order terminating appellant's parental rights; however, the Honorable Martha B. Tanner, presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, presided over the bench trial.

Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
AFFIRMED

This is an appeal from the trial court's order terminating appellant's parental rights to her two children. Appellant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to appellant who was advised of her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. This court attempted to contact appellant, but all mail has been returned as "undeliverable." No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The order of the trial court is affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re J.D.L., No. 04-11-00055-CV, 2011 WL 3328719, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 3, 2011, no pet.) (affirming judgment despite inability to inform appellant of rights pursuant to Anders).

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice


Summaries of

In re A.N.M.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 17, 2013
No. 04-13-00129-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2013)

acknowledging all of court's attempts to contact the appellant by mail were returned as "undeliverable"

Summary of this case from In re E.L.M.H.
Case details for

In re A.N.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A.N.M. and E.X.M.

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jul 17, 2013

Citations

No. 04-13-00129-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

In re E.L.M.H.

Both orders were returned as undeliverable. A third copy of the order notifying Appellant that she had the…