From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Bd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5372 (N.Y. 2009)

Opinion

173 SSM 17.

Decided on June 30, 2009.

Submitted by Janet D. Callahan, for appellants.

Submitted by Keith E. O'Toole, for respondent Town of Chili Planning Board.

Submitted by Jeffrey J. Harridine, for respondent Metalico Rochester, Inc.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, respondent Planning Board's determinations issuing a conditional use permit and a negative declaration annulled and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, with directions to remand to the Planning Board for further proceedings for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 59 AD3d 1017, 1019-1020).


Summaries of

In re Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Bd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 30, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5372 (N.Y. 2009)
Case details for

In re Anderson v. Town of Chili Planning Bd.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS ANDERSON, ET AL., Appellants, v. TOWN OF CHILI…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5372 (N.Y. 2009)