Summary
adopting new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.451
Summary of this case from In re Amendments to the Fla. Family Law Rules of ProcedureOpinion
No. SC13–74.
2013-11-14
In re AMENDMENTS TO The FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
Original Proceeding—Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Thomas Howell Bateman, III, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tallahassee, FL; Honorable Richard A. Nielsen, Past Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, FL; and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Ellen Sloyer, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner. John R. Hamilton of Foley & Lardner LLP, Orlando, FL, Responding with comments.
Original Proceeding—Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
Thomas Howell Bateman, III, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tallahassee, FL; Honorable Richard A. Nielsen, Past Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, FL; and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Ellen Sloyer, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner. John R. Hamilton of Foley & Lardner LLP, Orlando, FL, Responding with comments.
Robert J. Jones, General Magistrate, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, Responding with comments.
PER CURIAM.
We have for consideration the regular-cycle report of proposed rule amendments filed by The Florida Bar's Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee). SeeFla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(4). We have jurisdiction and adopt the amendments as proposed.
Seeart. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
BACKGROUND
The Committee proposes amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.380 (Failure to Make Discovery; Sanctions); 1.431 (Trial Jury); 1.442 (Proposals for Settlement); 1.480 (Motion for a Directed Verdict); 1.490 (Magistrates); 1.530 (Motions for New Trial and Rehearing; Amendments of Judgments); 1.560 (Discovery in Aid of Execution); and 1.630 (Extraordinary Remedies); and forms 1.910 (Subpoena for Trial); 1.911(Subpoena Duces Tecum for Trial); 1.912 (Subpoena for Deposition); 1.913 (Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition); 1.922 (Subpoena Duces Tecum without Deposition); 1.977 (Fact Information Sheet); 1.981 (Satisfaction of Judgment); 1.982 (Contempt Notice); and 1.997 (Civil Cover Sheet). The Committee proposes new rules 1.020 (Privacy and Court Records) and 1.451 (Taking Testimony). The Committee also proposes amendments to the Uniform Guidelines on Taxation of Costs. Consistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(b)(2), the Committee published the proposals for comment before filing them with the Court. The Committee made no changes in response to the two comments it received. The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously approved the proposals. After the proposals were filed, the Court published them for comment. Two comments were filed with the Court, one in support of the amendments to rule 1.630 (Extraordinary Remedies) and another suggesting extensive revisions to the Committee's proposal concerning rule 1.490 (Magistrates). The Committee filed a response to the comments. The Committee also filed a supplemental petition proposing an additional amendment to rule 1.490.
AMENDMENTS
The majority of the Committee's proposals are straightforward, and no comments were filed opposing them. We adopt those proposals without further discussion. We discuss only new rule 1.451 (Taking Testimony) and the amendments to rules 1.442 (Proposals for Settlement) and 1.490 (Magistrates), which we also adopt as proposed.
A majority of the Committee members urge the Court to delete the rule 1.442(c)(2)(B) (Form and Content of Proposal for Settlement) requirement that the proposal for settlement “identify the claim or claims the proposal is attempting to resolve” and replace it with the requirement that the proposal “state that [it] resolves all damages that would otherwise be awarded in a final judgment in the action,” subject to the provision in the rule governing attorney fees. The majority of the Committee determined that the amendment was needed to curtail partial proposals for settlement and to comport with section 768.79(2), Florida Statutes (2012), which states, in pertinent part, that “[t]he offer [to settle] shall be construed as including all damages which could be awarded in a final judgment.” Although the Committee reported that a minority of its members are of the view that the rule should not be changed without clarification from the Legislature or the courts, we defer to the majority view and amend the rule as proposed.
New rule 1.451 (Taking Testimony), which we adopt as proposed, authorizes a court to permit testimony at a civil hearing or trial by audio or video communication equipment by agreement of the parties or for good cause shown on written request of a party and reasonable notice to all other parties. The Committee proposed the new civil procedure rule in response to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.530 (Communication Equipment), which permits a court to allow testimony to be taken through communication equipment if all the parties consent or if permitted by another applicable rule of procedure.
In 2011, at the urging of the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee, the Court amended rule 2.530 to allow testimony to be taken by communication equipment without the parties' consent “if permitted by another applicable rule of procedure.” See In re Amend. Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., 73 So.3d 210, 211 (Fla.2011). That amendment was intended to “allow the various Florida Bar rules committees to consider whether their bodies of rules should be amended to allow for the use of communication equipment without the parties' consent.” Id. According to the report in this case, when drafting new rule 1.451, the Committee was mindful of the need for consistency with rule 2.530. The Committee also addressed the need to provide guidance to the court by adding a committee note to the rule that offers factors the court may consider in determining whether good cause exists to permit testimony by audio or video equipment over objection.
Finally, we adopt the proposed amendments to rule 1.490 (Magistrates), which governs appointment of magistrates in civil cases. According to the Committee report, the amendments are intended to make the civil rule more consistent with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.257 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.490, which govern the appointment of magistrates in juvenile and family law cases. The requirement in rule 1.490 that “[u]nless otherwise ordered by the court, all hearings must be held in the courthouse of the county where the action is pending” is deleted. As proposed in the supplemental petition, the words “in writing” are deleted from the sentence in newly-designated subdivision (g) that governs the taking of evidence at the hearing. This amendment is consistent with the use of electronic recording of the proceedings. As amended, rule 1.490 now requires exceptions to the magistrate's report to be filed rather than served. Various requirements also are added to the rule for: (1) the notice of hearing concerning the use of electronic recording or court reporting to create the record; (2) the magistrate's report; (3) cross-exceptions to the magistrate's report; and (4) the record needed to support a party's exceptions to the magistrate's report.
According to the report, the Committee proposed some of the amendments at the suggestion of Robert J. Jones, General Magistrate in the Eleventh Circuit (Miami–Dade County). Mr. Jones also filed comments with both the Committee and the Court and participated in discussions with Committee members regarding his suggested extensive revisions to the Committee's proposals. According to the Committee's response filed with the Court, the Committee considered but rejected Mr. Jones' proposed total rewrite of rule 1.490 to mirror Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure 12.490 (General Magistrates) and 12.492 (Special Magistrates), choosing instead to make a number of measured improvements to the notice, record, report, and exception provisions of rule 1.490. The Committee determined that the limited use of magistrates in cases governed by the civil procedure rules suggests that there is no need for uniformity in the treatment of magistrates across the different sets of procedural rules. Therefore, the Committee urges against the “wholesale” revisions suggested by Mr. Jones.
After considering the Committee's proposals, Mr. Jones' suggested revisions, and the Committee's response, we defer to the Committee and adopt its more measured changes to rule 1.490. However, we thank both the Committee members and Mr. Jones for their efforts to improve the civil procedure rules pertaining to magistrates.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Uniform Guidelines on Taxation of Costs as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The committee notes are offered for explanation only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 2014, at 12:01 a.m.
It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX
RULE 1.020. PRIVACY AND COURT RECORDS
Every pleading or other paper filed with the court shall comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425.
RULE 1.380. FAILURE TO MAKE DISCOVERY; SANCTIONS
(a) Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. Upon reasonable notice to other parties and all persons affected, a party may apply for an order compelling discovery as follows:
(1)–(3) [No Change]
(4) Award of Expenses of Motion. If the motion is granted and after opportunity for hearing, the court shall require the party or deponent whose conduct necessitated the motion or the party or counsel advising the conduct to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining the order that may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the movant failed to certify in the motion that a good faith effort was made to obtain the discovery without court action, that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified, or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.If the motion is denied and after opportunity for hearing, the court shall require the moving party to pay to the party or deponent who opposed the motion the reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the motion that may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the making of the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. If the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the court may apportion the reasonable expenses incurred as a result of making the motion among the parties and persons.
(b) Failure to Comply with Order.
(1) [No Change]
(2) If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under rule 1.310(b)(6) or 1.320(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, including an order made under subdivision (a) of this rule or rule 1.360, the court in which the action is pending may make any of the following orders:
(A)–(E) [No Change]
Instead of any of the foregoing orders or in addition to them, the court shall require the party failing to obey the order to pay the reasonable expenses caused by the failure, which may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.
(c) [No Change]
(d) Failure of Party to Attend at Own Deposition or Serve Answers to Interrogatories or Respond to Request for Inspection. If a party or an officer, director, or managing agent of a party or a person designated under rule 1.310(b)(6) or 1.320(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails (1) to appear before the officer who is to take the deposition after being served with a proper notice, (2) to serve answers or objections to interrogatories submitted under rule 1.340 after proper service of the interrogatories, or (3) to serve a written response to a request for inspection submitted under rule 1.350 after proper service of the request, the court in which the action is pending may take any action authorized under paragraphs (A), (B), and (C) of subdivision (b)(2) of this rule. Any motion specifying a failure under clause (2) or (3) of this subdivision shall include a certification that the movant, in good faith, has conferred or attempted to confer with the party failing to answer or respond in an effort to obtain such answer or response without court action. Instead of any order or in addition to it, the court shall require the party failing to act to pay the reasonable expenses caused by the failure, which may include attorneys' fees, unless the court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. The failure to act described in this subdivision may not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order as provided by rule 1.280(c).
(e) [No Change]
Committee Notes
1972–2012 Amendments. [No Change]
2013 Amendment. This rule was amended to add “substantially” before “justified” in subdivisions (a)(4), (b)(2), and (d), to make the rule internally consistent and to make it more consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, from which it was derived.
RULE 1.431. TRIAL JURY
(a)–(h) [No Change]
(i) Communication with the Jury. This rule governs all communication between the judge or courtroom personnel and jurors.
(1) Communication to be on the Record. The court shall notify the parties of any communication from the jury pertaining to the action as promptly as practicable and in any event before responding to the communication. Except as set forth below, all communications between the court or courtroom personnel and the jury shall be on the record in open court or shall be in writing and filed in the action. The court or courtroom personnel shall note on any written communication to or from the jury the date and time it was delivered.
(2) Exception for Certain Routine Communication. The court shall, by pretrial order or by statement on the record with opportunity for objection, set forth the scope of routine ex parte communication to be permitted and the limits imposed by the court with regard to such communication.
(A) Routine ex parte communication between the bailiff or other courtroom personnel and the jurors, limited to juror comfort and safety, may occur off the record.
(B) In no event shall ex parte communication between courtroom personnel and jurors extend to matters that may affect the outcome of the trial, including statements containing any fact or opinion concerning a party, attorney, or procedural matter or relating to any legal issue or lawsuit.
(3) Instructions to Jury. During voir dire, the court shall instruct the jurors and courtroom personnel regarding the limitations on communication between the court or courtroom personnel and jurors. Upon empanelling the jury, the court shall instruct the jurors that their questions are to be submitted in writing to the court, which will review them with the parties and counsel before responding.
(4) Notification of Jury Communication. Courtroom personnel shall immediately notify the court of any communication to or from a juror or among jurors in contravention of the court's orders or instructions, including all communication contrary to the requirements of this rule.
Committee Notes
1971 Adoption—2005 Amendment. [No Change]
2013 Amendment. Subdivision (i) governs the responsibility of the court for ensuring that parties and their counsel are aware of all contact with the jury that could affect the outcome of the case. Trial judges may have differing views on what constitutes harmless or routine ex parte communication with jurors. Reasonable variations are therefore permitted, provided the judge adequately advises counsel, before the trial begins, of the specific circumstances under which the court has determined that jury communications will not be reported to the parties. The rule does not prevent the bailiff or other courtroom personnel from discussing such routine matters as juror parking, location of break areas, how and when to assemble for duty, dress, and which items of a juror's personal property may be brought into the courthouse or jury room. However, for example, questions or remarks from a juror about such matters as the length of a witness's testimony, when court will adjourn on a given day, or how long the trial may take to complete should be reported to the judge, as these matters may be of interest to the parties. Any doubt as to whether a communication may or may not be of interest to the parties should be resolved in favor of promptly informing the court, the parties, and counsel, even if it is after the fact. This will best ensure that the parties have the opportunity to object to any improper communication and give the court an opportunity to cure any prejudice, if an objection is made.
RULE 1.442. PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT
(a)–(b) [No Change]
(c) Form and Content of Proposal for Settlement.
(1) A proposal shall be in writing and shall identify the applicable Florida law under which it is being made.
(2) A proposal shall:
(A) [No Change]
(B) i state that the proposal resolves all damages that would otherwise be awarded in a final judgment in the action in which the proposal is served, subject to subdivision (F); dentify the claim or claims the proposal is attempting to resolve
(C)–(G) [No Change]
(3)–(4) [No Change]
(d)–(j) [No Change]
Committee Notes
1996–2013 Amendments. [No Change]
2013 Amendment. Subdivision (c)(2)(B) is amended to clarify that a proposal for settlement must resolve all claims between the proponent and the party to whom the proposal is made except claims for attorneys' fees, which may or may not be resolved in the proposal.
RULE 1.451. TAKING TESTIMONY
(a) Testimony at Hearing or Trial. When testifying at a hearing or trial, a witness must be physically present unless otherwise provided by law or rule of procedure.
(b) Communication Equipment. The court may permit a witness to testify at a hearing or trial by contemporaneous audio or video communication equipment (1) by agreement of the parties or (2) for good cause shown upon written request of a party upon reasonable notice to all other parties. The request and notice must contain the substance of the proposed testimony and an estimate of the length of the proposed testimony. In considering sufficient good cause, the court shall weigh and address in its order the reasons stated for testimony by communication equipment against the potential for prejudice to the objecting party.
(c) Required Equipment. Communication equipment as used in this rule means a conference telephone or other electronic device that permits all those appearing or participating to hear and speak to each other simultaneously and permits all conversations of all parties to be audible to all persons present. Contemporaneous video communications equipment must make the witness visible to all participants during the testimony. For testimony by any of the foregoing means, there must be appropriate safeguards for the court to maintain sufficient control over the equipment and the transmission of the testimony so the court may stop the communication to accommodate objection or prevent prejudice.
(d) Oath. Testimony may be taken through communication equipment only if a notary public or other person authorized to administer oaths in the witness's jurisdiction is present with the witness and administers the oath consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction.
(e) Burden of Expense. The cost for the use of the communication equipment is the responsibility of the requesting party unless otherwise ordered by the court.
Committee Note
2013 Adoption. This rule allows the parties to agree, or one or more parties to request, that the court authorize presentation of witness testimony by contemporaneous video or audio communications equipment. A party seeking to present such testimony over the objection of another party must still satisfy the good-cause standard. In determining whether good cause exists, the trial court may consider such factors as the type and stage of proceeding, the presence or absence of constitutionally protected rights, the importance of the testimony to the resolution of the case, the amount in controversy in the case, the relative cost or inconvenience of requiring the presence of the witness in court, the ability of counsel to use necessary exhibits or demonstrative aids, the limitations (if any) placed on the opportunity for opposing counsel and the finder of fact to observe the witness's demeanor, the potential for unfair surprise, the witness's affiliation with one or more parties, and any other factors the court reasonably deems material to weighing the justification the requesting party has offered in support of the request to allow a witness to testify by communications equipment against the potential for prejudice to the objecting party. With the advance of technology, the cost and availability of contemporaneous video testimony may be considered by the court in determining whether good cause is established for audio testimony.
RULE 1.480. MOTION FOR A DIRECTED VERDICT
(a) [No Change]
(b) Reservation of Decision on Motion. When a motion for a directed verdict is denied or for any reason is not granted, the court is deemed to have submitted the action to the jury subject to a later determination of the legal questions raised by the motion. Within 15 days after the return of a verdict, a party who has timely moved for a directed verdict may serve a motion to set aside the verdict and any judgment entered thereon and to enter judgment in accordance with the motion for a directed verdict. If a verdict was not returned, a party who has timely moved for a directed verdict may serve a motion for judgment in accordance with the motion for a directed verdict within 10 15 days after discharge of the jury. 10
(c) [No Change]
Committee Notes
1996–2010 Amendments.[No Change]
2013 Amendment. Subdivision (b) is amended to change the time for service of a motion from 10 to 15 days after the specified event.
RULE 1.490. MAGISTRATES
(a)–(e) [No Change]
(f) Notice of Hearings. The magistrate shall assign a time and place for proceedings as soon as reasonably possible after the reference is made and give notice to each of the parties. The notice or order setting a matter for hearing before the magistrate must state if electronic recording or a court reporter will be used to create a record of the proceedings. If electronic recording is to be used, the notice must state that any party may have a court reporter transcribe the record of the proceedings at that party's expense. If any party fails to appear, the magistrate may proceed ex parte or may adjourn the proceeding to a future day, giving notice to the absent party of the adjournment.
(g) Hearings. The magistrate shall proceed with reasonable diligence in every reference and with the least practicable delay. Any party may apply to the court for an order to the magistrate to speed the proceedings and to make the report and to certify to the court the reason for any delay. The evidence shall be taken Unless otherwise ordered by the court, all hearings shall be held in the courthouse of the county where the action is pending. by the magistrate or by some other person under the magistrate's authority in the magistrate's presence and shall be filed with the magistrate's report. The magistrate shall have authority to examine the parties and all witnesses produced by the parties on oath in writing and to require production of all books, papers, writings, vouchers, and other documents applicable to the referenced matters upon all matters contained in the reference The magistrate shall admit evidence by deposition or that is otherwise admissible in court. The magistrate may take all actions concerning evidence that can be taken by the court and in the same manner. All parties accounting before a magistrate shall bring in their accounts in the form of accounts payable and receivable, and any other parties who are not satisfied with the account may examine the accounting party orally or by interrogatories or deposition as the magistrate directs. All depositions and documents that have been taken or used previously in the action may be used before the magistrate. it and to examine on oath orally all witnesses produced by the parties
( h ) Magistrate's Report. g The magistrate must file the report on the referenced matters and serve copies on all parties, and include the name and address of any court reporter who transcribed the proceedings. The magistrate's report must contain the following language in bold type: In the reports made by the magistrate no part of any statement of facts, account, charge, deposition, examination, or answer used before the magistrate shall be recited. The matters shall be identified to inform the court what items were used.
IF YOU WISH TO SEEK REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE MAGISTRATE, YOU MUST FILE EXCEPTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.490(i). YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH A RECORD SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT YOUR EXCEPTIONS OR YOUR EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DENIED. A RECORD ORDINARILY INCLUDES A WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT OF ALL RELEVANT PROCEEDINGS. THE PERSON SEEKING REVIEW MUST HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT PREPARED IF NECESSARY FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW.
( j ) Filing Report; Notice; Exceptions. h The parties may The magistrate shall file the report and serve copies on the parties. file exceptions to the report within 10 days serve after it is served from the time . Any party may file cross-exceptions within 5 days from the service of the exceptions. If no exceptions are timely filed, on them the court shall take appropriate action on the report. If exceptions are timely filed within that period, the court shall resolve the exceptions at a hearing on reasonable notice they shall be heard The filing of cross-exceptions shall not delay a hearing on the exceptions and cross-exceptions unless good cause is shown. by either party
(j) Record. A party filing exceptions to the magistrate's report must provide the court in advance of the hearing a record sufficient to support that party's exceptions.
(1) The record shall include the court file, designated portions of the transcript of proceedings before the magistrate, and all depositions and evidence presented to the magistrate. The designated transcript portions must be delivered to the court and all other parties at least 48 hours before the hearing.
(2) If the party filing exceptions has the court reporter prepare less than a full transcript of proceedings before the magistrate, that party must promptly file a notice designating the portions of the transcript that have been ordered. The other parties must be given reasonable time after service of the notice to arrange for the preparation and designation of other portions of the transcript for the court to consider at the hearing.
Committee Notes
1971–1980 Amendments. [No Change]
Court Commentary
[No Change]
RULE 1.530. MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL AND REHEARING; AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS
(a) [No Change]
(b) Time for Motion. A motion for new trial or for rehearing shall be served not later than 15 days after the return of the verdict in a jury action or the date of filing of the judgment in a non-jury action. A timely motion may be amended to state new grounds in the discretion of the court at any time before the motion is determined. 10
(c) [No Change]
(d) On Initiative of Court. Not later than 15 days after entry of judgment or within the time of ruling on a timely motion for a rehearing or a new trial made by a party, the court of its own initiative may order a rehearing or a new trial for any reason for which it might have granted a rehearing or a new trial on motion of a party. 10
(e)–(f) [No Change]
(g) Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment. A motion to alter or amend the judgment shall be served not later than 15 days after entry of the judgment, except that this rule does not affect the remedies in rule 1.540(b). 10
Committee Notes
1992 Amendment. [No Change]
2013 Amendment. Subdivisions (b) and (g) are amended to change the deadlines for service of certain motions from 10 to 15 days after the specified event. Subdivision (d) is amended to change the deadline for a court to act of its own initiative.
Court Commentary
[No Change]
RULE 1.560. DISCOVERY IN AID OF EXECUTION
(a)–(d) [No Change]
(e) Notice of Compliance. The judgment debtor shall file with the clerk of court a notice of compliance with the order to complete form 1.977, and serve a copy of the notice of compliance on the judgment creditor or the judgment creditor's attorney.
Committee Notes
1972–2000 Amendments.[No Change]
2013 Amendment. Subdivision (e) was deleted because the filing of a notice of compliance is unnecessary for the judgment creditor to seek relief from the court for noncompliance with this rule, and because the Fact Information Sheet itself should not be filed with the clerk of the court.
RULE 1.630. EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES
(a) Applicability. This rule applies to actions for the issuance of writs of mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and habeas corpus. certiorari,
(b) [No Change]
(c) Time. A complaint shall be filed within the time provided by law, except that a complaint for common law certiorari shall be filed within 30 days of rendition of the matter sought to be reviewed.
(d) Process. If the complaint shows a prima facie case for relief, the court shall issue:
(1) a summons in certiorari;
an order nisi in prohibition;(2)
( 2 ) an alternative writ in mandamus that may incorporate the complaint by reference only;3
(4 3 ) a writ of quo warranto; or
( 4 ) a writ of habeas corpus.5
The writ shall be served in the manner prescribed by law, except the summons in certiorari shall be served as provided in rule 1.080.
(e) [No Change]
Court Commentary
[No Change]
Committee Notes
2012 Amendment. [No Change]
2013 Amendment. Rule 1.630 has been amended to remove any reference to certiorari proceedings, which instead are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure apply when the circuit courts exercise their appellate jurisdiction.
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE
IMAGE