From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Air Crash Disaster Near Dayton, Ohio

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Mar 23, 1970
310 F. Supp. 798 (J.P.M.L. 1970)

Opinion

No. 38.

March 23, 1970.

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.

Although Judge Robson did not attend the hearing he has with the consent of all parties participated in this decision.


OPINION AND ORDER


This multidistrict litigation presently encompasses thirteen actions pending in three federal district courts. They all result from a mid-air collision between a small private plane and a Trans World Airlines jetliner. All twenty-six persons aboard the two planes were killed.

We were advised at the hearing that there are eleven related actions pending in state courts in Illinois.

On February 9, 1970 an order was directed to the parties to show cause why the actions listed on Schedule A should not be transferred to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Some of the parties declined to respond to the show cause order or to appear at the February 27, 1970 hearing in New York City but of those appearing, several plaintiffs and the Tann Company opposed transfer under § 1407 while Trans World Airlines and the United States supported transfer.

The owner of the small aircraft involved in the collision.

None of the parties deny the existence of common questions of fact nor do any dispute the necessity for some type of coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Those opposing transfer under § 1407 assert that informal coordination of pretrial proceedings has been very satisfactory and has led to substantial discovery and resulted in many settlements. Those favoring transfer concede that cooperation between all counsel has generally been good and that pretrial proceedings have progressed rather smoothly but they urge that transfer for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under § 1407 would further promote the just and efficient conduct of these actions and would serve the parties and their witnesses by providing a single forum for the supervision and control of pretrial proceedings. Since discovery as to liability will not be completed in the immediate future we agree that transfer is appropriate at this time.

All agree that if there is to be a transfer, the Southern District of Ohio should be designated as the transferee court. We have consistently held that the district containing the situs of the crash is generally the most appropriate transferee district for litigation of this type. In re Fairland, Indiana Air Disaster Litigation, (JPML February 10, 1970) and the cases cited therein. In addition to the fact that the crash occurred in the Southern District of Ohio the vast majority of the pending actions were filed in or have been transferred to that district under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). All of these actions have been assigned to a single judge — Chief Judge Carl A. Weinman. The transfer of the remaining actions to the Southern District of Ohio and their assignment to Chief Judge Weinman for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings will insure that discovery which has already taken place will not be duplicated and that future pretrial proceedings will be conducted expeditiously and efficiently.

It is therefore ordered that the actions listed on Schedule A pending in other districts are hereby transferred to the Southern District of Ohio, Dayton Division, and with the written consent of that court which has been filed with the Clerk of the Panel, they are hereby assigned to the Honorable Carl A. Weinman for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings with the related actions now pending in that court.

SCHEDULE A Southern District of Ohio

Vera F. Downey, etc. v. Trans World Civil Action Airlines, Inc., et al. No. 3521
Pittsburgh National Bank, etc. v. Civil Action Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al. No. 3563
Virginia Bauer, etc. v. United Civil Action States of America No. 3640
Dennis Charles Markley, etc. v. Civil Action United States of America No. 3641
Ethel A. Strobel, etc. v. United Civil Action States of America No. 3639
Sue A. Clough, etc. v. Tann Company Civil Action No. 3656
Joan G. Schaefer, etc. v. United Civil Action States of America No. 3670
Eliner M. Palmer, etc. v. Trans Civil Action World Airlines, Inc., et al. No. 3777
Julia E. Wilds, etc. v. United Civil Action States of America No. 3782

Eastern District of Michigan

Dorothy Burgstahler, etc. v. Trans Civil Action World Airlines, Inc. No. 32039
Eliner M. Palmer, etc. v. Herman Civil Action Tann d/b/a Tann Company, et al. No. 30816
Tann Company v. United States of America Civil Action No. 32842]

Southern District of New York

George H. Humphries, etc. v. United Civil Action States of America No. 69 Civ 3023


Summaries of

In re Air Crash Disaster Near Dayton, Ohio

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Mar 23, 1970
310 F. Supp. 798 (J.P.M.L. 1970)
Case details for

In re Air Crash Disaster Near Dayton, Ohio

Case Details

Full title:In re Multidistrict Civil Actions Involving the AIR CRASH DISASTER NEAR…

Court:Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Date published: Mar 23, 1970

Citations

310 F. Supp. 798 (J.P.M.L. 1970)

Citing Cases

In re Multidistrict Civil Actions, Air Crash Disaster, Dayton

The actions in this litigation were transferred by the Panel to the Southern District of Ohio and assigned to…

In re Master Key

Cf. In re Frost Patent Litigation, 316 F. Supp. 977 (JPML 1970); Hanover, New Hampshire Air Disaster…