From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ADOR REALTY v. DIV. OF HOUS

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Jan 4, 2007
14 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)

Summary

requiring turnover of internal firm documents in a legal malpractice case because the presumption that such documents were not useful to the client did not apply

Summary of this case from McKinstry v. Genser (In re Black Diamond Mining Co.)

Opinion

No. 18577/06.

January 4, 2007.


Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation — Individual Apartment Increase.


Summaries of

ADOR REALTY v. DIV. OF HOUS

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Jan 4, 2007
14 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)

requiring turnover of internal firm documents in a legal malpractice case because the presumption that such documents were not useful to the client did not apply

Summary of this case from McKinstry v. Genser (In re Black Diamond Mining Co.)
Case details for

ADOR REALTY v. DIV. OF HOUS

Case Details

Full title:Matter of Ador Realty LLC v. Division of Hous. Community Renewal

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County

Date published: Jan 4, 2007

Citations

14 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 50037
836 N.Y.S.2d 483

Citing Cases

McKinstry v. Genser (In re Black Diamond Mining Co.)

In such cases, the client's needs trump attorney privacy. See Bolton v. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, 14…

In re Refco Sec. Litigationkenneth M. Krys

In this case, the Krys Plaintiffs argue that they have a need for the E-mail because it demonstrates Gibson…