From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Actos (Pioglitazone) 6:12-Cv-00643 Civil Action No. 6:12-Cv-00791

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2016
MDL NO. 6:11-md-02299 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2016)

Opinion

MDL NO. 6:11-md-02299

03-18-2016

IN RE: ACTOS (PIOGLITAZONE) This document applies to: Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00643 Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00791


JUDGE DOHERTY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Sonia Webb (the plaintiff in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00643) and Excell Marks (the plaintiff in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00791) are unrepresented. They were ordered to appear in court on March 15, 2016. (Rec. Doc. 6200). However, the record indicates that, despite notice of the hearing being sent to each of them via certified mail, return receipt requested, service was not perfected. The record further shows that Ms. Webb and Mr. Marks were previously ordered to appear in court in person on October 28, 2014 but they failed to appear. (Rec. Doc. 4864; Rec. Doc. 212 in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00643, Rec. Doc. 213 in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00791). The record indicates that service was confirmed as to Mr. Marks at that time, but could not be confirmed as to Ms. Webb.

Like any other litigant, an unrepresented litigant has a duty to provide the court with accurate contact information and to update that information in the event of any changes as well as a duty to prosecute his or her case. A litigant also has a duty to comply with the orders of the court. Accordingly,

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the claims asserted by Ms. Webb and Mr. Marks be dismissed due to these parties' failures to comply with the rules and instructions of the court and the terms of the court's orders of October 16, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 4814) and February 5, 2016 (Rec. Doc. 6200).

Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 18th day of March 2016.

/s/_________

PATRICK J. HANNA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Actos (Pioglitazone) 6:12-Cv-00643 Civil Action No. 6:12-Cv-00791

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2016
MDL NO. 6:11-md-02299 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2016)
Case details for

In re Actos (Pioglitazone) 6:12-Cv-00643 Civil Action No. 6:12-Cv-00791

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ACTOS (PIOGLITAZONE) This document applies to: Civil Action No…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

MDL NO. 6:11-md-02299 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2016)