From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Active Wet Wash Laundry Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 14, 1934
8 F. Supp. 966 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)

Opinion

April 14, 1934.

Max E. Sanders, of New York City (David L. Shandalow, of New York City, of counsel), for Edmund Wright.

Dills, Muecke Schelker, of New York City (Walter G. Schelker, of New York City, of counsel), for Troy Laundry Machinery Co.



It is ordered that the decision herein of the Hon. John E. Joyce, Referee in Bankruptcy herein, dated January 26, 1934, be and the same hereby is in all respects affirmed and approved.


Summaries of

In re Active Wet Wash Laundry Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 14, 1934
8 F. Supp. 966 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)
Case details for

In re Active Wet Wash Laundry Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re ACTIVE WET WASH LAUNDRY CO., Inc

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 14, 1934

Citations

8 F. Supp. 966 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)

Citing Cases

White v. Steinman

Accordingly the rights of the trustee as representative of the creditors must prevail over the invalid lien…

Matter of Levine

The appellant relies on the 1957 and 1958 filings to validate the mortgage as against persons who became…