From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A.C

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 2, 2003
848 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

reversing dependency adjudication of two sons based solely on Department's showing that daughter's allegation of father's sexual abuse placed the sons at risk

Summary of this case from In the Interest of G.C.A

Opinion

Case Nos. 2D02-341; 2D02-2727.

Opinion filed July 2, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John S. Carlin, Judge.

J. L. "Ray" LeGrande of LeGrande LeGrande, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.

William Byrne Isaacs, Port Charlotte, for Appellee.


In these consolidated appeals, L.C. challenges dependency adjudications of his four children, three sons and one daughter, based solely on his daughter's allegation that he sexually abused her.

There was insufficient evidence to support the boys' dependency based on an alleged risk of future harm by the father. As the Florida Supreme Court held in In re M.F., 770 So.2d 1189, 1194 (Fla. 2000):

A simple showing by DCF that a parent committed a sex act on one child does not by itself constitute proof that the parent poses a substantial risk of imminent abuse or neglect to the child's sibling, as required by the statute. While the commission of such an act may be highly relevant, it is not automatically dispositive of the issue of dependency. A court instead should focus on all the circumstances surrounding the petition in each case.

Here, the dependency petition did not allege, nor did the Department prove, any circumstances that placed the sons at risk. We therefore reverse the adjudication of dependency as to the three sons.

L.C. also challenges his daughter's dependency, contending that evidence of her ulterior motive to fabricate renders the evidence insufficient. While we may have reservations about the truthfulness of the girl's allegations, we cannot question the trial court's assessment of her credibility because it was in a superior position to evaluate her testimony. Accordingly, we affirm the dependency adjudication of the daughter.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.


Summaries of

In re A.C

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 2, 2003
848 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

reversing dependency adjudication of two sons based solely on Department's showing that daughter's allegation of father's sexual abuse placed the sons at risk

Summary of this case from In the Interest of G.C.A
Case details for

In re A.C

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of A.C., J.C., J.C., and L.C., children L.C., Appellant…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 2, 2003

Citations

848 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

In the Interest of G.C.A

See In re M.F., 770 So.2d 1189, 1194 (Fla. 2000) (citing Padgett, 577 So.2d 565). See also In re A.C., 848…

Logreira v. Logreira

Indeed, she stated she was uncertain as to whether forced participation in Family Bridges would…