From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Abramowitz

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 14, 2008
940 A.2d 298 (N.J. 2008)

Opinion

February 14, 2008.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-185, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent) that ARNOLD N. ABRAMOWITZ of IRVINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ARNOLD M. ABRAMOWITZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Abramowitz

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 14, 2008
940 A.2d 298 (N.J. 2008)
Case details for

In re Abramowitz

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ARNOLD H. ABRAMOWITZ, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 14, 2008

Citations

940 A.2d 298 (N.J. 2008)
940 A.2d 298

Citing Cases

In re Du

Reprimands have been imposed in default matters involving similar violations, except for misrepresentations.…

In re Abramowitz

On February 13, 2008, in a default matter, respondent received a reprimand for lack of diligence, failure to…