From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re A. R

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 9, 2011
309 Ga. App. 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. A11A0147.

DECIDED JUNE 9, 2011.

Guardianship. Fulton Juvenile Court. Before Judge Boyd.

Nathan A. Hayes, for appellant.

Sidney A. Robbins, Reginald W. Williams, for appellee.


In this guardianship case, A. R. and C. R., minor children of Falanda Glover, appeal from the juvenile court's order terminating the temporary guardianship of their paternal grandmother, Margaret Pulliam, and returning their custody to Glover, contending that the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact.

Neither Glover nor Pulliam has appealed. Nonetheless, this appeal is properly before us. In the Interest of M. B. B., 241 Ga. App. 249, 250 (1) (a) ( 526 SE2d 76) (1999).

Following a finding that A. R. and C. R. were deprived based on the incarceration of Glover, Margaret Pulliam filed a petition for letters of temporary guardianship. Glover filed no objection to the petition, and the trial court granted guardianship of A. R. and C. R. to Pulliam on January 31, 2008. Following Glover's filing of motions to terminate the guardianship, a final hearing was held on March 11, 2010, and the trial court entered its order granting the motion to terminate on March 15, 2010.

Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-52 (a), "in all nonjury trials in courts of record, the court shall upon request of any party made prior to such ruling, find the facts specially and shall state separately its conclusions of law." Written findings of fact and conclusions of law are required to be made by the trial court in contested child custody cases. Guardianship has been equated with custody, thereby making this requirement applicable to termination of guardianship proceedings.

E.g., Coleman v. Coleman, 238 Ga. 183, 184 ( 232 SE2d 57) (1977); Motes v. Stanton, 237 Ga. 440, 441 ( 228 SE2d 831) (1976); Couch v. Couch, 111 Ga. App. 773, 774 ( 341 SE2d 303) (1986).

Boddie v. Daniels, 288 Ga. 143, 144-145 ( 702 SE2d 172) (2010); Zinkhan v. Bruce, 305 Ga. App. 510, 513 (1) ( 699 SE2d 833) (2010).

Therefore, the juvenile court is hereby directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its decision was based.

Judgment reversed with direction. Smith, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.


DECIDED JUNE 9, 2011.


Summaries of

In re A. R

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 9, 2011
309 Ga. App. 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

In re A. R

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF A. R. et al., children

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 9, 2011

Citations

309 Ga. App. 844 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)
711 S.E.2d 402

Citing Cases

In re K. H.

Guardianship is equated with custody. See In the Interest of A. R., 309 Ga.App. 844, 845 (711 S.E.2d 402)…

In re W.L.H.

According to the Fulton County Office of the Child Attorney, which filed an amicus brief in this case, the…