From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Matter, Eberhardt v. Monroe Cty. C.S.E.U

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-00748.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Siracuse, J.), entered December 2, 2002, which, inter alia, declared that respondent is barred from recovering certain child support arrears.

CHARLES S. TURNER, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SHELA FERO GIESS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

LINSNER, SESSLER DYS, LIVONIA (STEVEN D. SESSLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Before: PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly declared that respondent is barred from recovering child support arrears that accrued more than six years prior to the date on which petitioner's ex-wife filed a petition in Family Court seeking recovery of child support arrears. The arrearages arose under a divorce decree entered in March 1987, prior to the effective date of CPLR 211 (e), and are thus subject to the six-year limitations period set forth in CPLR 213 (1) ( see Shavit v. Shavit, 279 A.D.2d 180, 183, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 719; Thurmond v. Thurmond, 155 A.D.2d 527, 530; see also Matter of Dox v. Tynon, 90 N.Y.2d 166, 176). Finally, the court properly determined that respondent must apply the payments made by petitioner in the manner set forth in 18 NYCRR 347.13.


Summaries of

In Matter, Eberhardt v. Monroe Cty. C.S.E.U

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In Matter, Eberhardt v. Monroe Cty. C.S.E.U

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF GERARD EBERHARDT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MONROE COUNTY CHILD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 416

Citing Cases

Giordano v. Perrier

Furthermore, contrary to the Supreme Court's conclusion, the plaintiff demonstrated, prima facie, the merit…