From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Interest of S.N.D., J.D

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 16, 1992
605 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-00017.

October 16, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Charles A. Davis, Jr., J.

Byron P. Hileman, Winter Haven, for appellant.

Roland Reis, Bartow, for appellee.


An indigent father of two minor children appeals from the trial court's order of adjudication of dependency and protection services supervision. He concedes that he initially waived his right to counsel but contends that the trial court erred in failing to make a renewed offer of assistance of counsel at the disposition hearing. That hearing resulted in the order which included the requirement that the children "shall be placed in the legal custody of the paternal aunt and uncle . . . until further order of the Court or until each child dies, marries, or reaches the age of 18 years."

We agree with his contention. We need not determine whether, as he argues, he in effect made a request for the assistance of counsel at the disposition hearing. Under Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.320(b)(3), "If a waiver is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the offer of assistance of counsel shall be renewed by the court at each subsequent stage of the proceedings at which the party appears without counsel." There was no such renewal in this case. See Staley v. Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 528 So.2d 505 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed and remanded for the renewed offer of assistance of counsel referred to above.

SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In Interest of S.N.D., J.D

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 16, 1992
605 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

In Interest of S.N.D., J.D

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF S.N.D. AND J.D., CHILDREN. S.D., FATHER, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 16, 1992

Citations

605 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

In the Interest of S.S

Accordingly, we vacate the order denying relief from judgment and direct the trial court to comply with rule…

In the Interest of A.W.P

The Department correctly concedes that A.W.P., Sr.'s rights were violated by the trial court's failure to…