In Interest of D.A.G

Full title: In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. D.Z. and D.P., Appellants…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 30, 2004

878 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-4375.

July 30, 2004.

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Pasco County, William R. Webb, Judge.

Eugene L. Beil of Beil Hay, P.A., Hudson, for Appellants.

Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Andrea Lasker Bradford, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court's nonfinal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives' timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari.See Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2004); A.D. v. K.S. (In re S.D.), 869 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Petition denied.

DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.