From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impinj, Inc. v. NXP U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 14, 2024
4:19-cv-03161-YGR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

4:19-cv-03161-YGR

03-14-2024

IMPINJ, INC., Plaintiff, v. NXP USA, INC., Defendant.

Lisa L. Furby (admitted pro hac vice) Tharan Gregory Lanier, Michael C. Hendershot, JONES DAY Thomas W. Ritchie (admitted pro hac vice) Lisa L. Furby (admitted pro hac vice) John M. Michalik (admitted pro hac vice) Timothy J. Heverin (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Yury Kalish (admitted pro hac vice) Tracy A. Stitt (admitted pro hac vice) Robert Levent Herguner (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY T. Kaitlin Crowder (admitted pro hac vice) Robert M. Breetz (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Matthew J. Silveira, JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendant NXP USA, INC. Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Christina J. McCullough, Antoine M. McNamara, R. Tyler Kendrick, admitted pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP Daniel T. Shvodian, PERKINS COIE LLP Daniel T. Keese PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff IMPINJ, INC.


Location: Courtroom 1, 4th Floor

Trial Dated: March 18, 2024

Lisa L. Furby (admitted pro hac vice) Tharan Gregory Lanier, Michael C. Hendershot, JONES DAY Thomas W. Ritchie (admitted pro hac vice) Lisa L. Furby (admitted pro hac vice) John M. Michalik (admitted pro hac vice) Timothy J. Heverin (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Yury Kalish (admitted pro hac vice) Tracy A. Stitt (admitted pro hac vice) Robert Levent Herguner (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY T. Kaitlin Crowder (admitted pro hac vice) Robert M. Breetz (admitted pro hac vice) JONES DAY Matthew J. Silveira, JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendant NXP USA, INC.

Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Christina J. McCullough, Antoine M. McNamara, R. Tyler Kendrick, admitted pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP Daniel T. Shvodian, PERKINS COIE LLP Daniel T. Keese PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff IMPINJ, INC.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Hon. Yvonne Gonzales Rogers United States District Judge

Plaintiff Impinj, Inc. and Defendant NXP USA, Inc. have entered into a settlement agreement that resolves the claims and counterclaims asserted in this Action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their counsel, that pursuant to Rules 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Action, including all claims, counterclaims and affirmative defenses asserted by a party, shall be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, the below filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above Signatories.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Impinj, Inc. v. NXP U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 14, 2024
4:19-cv-03161-YGR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Impinj, Inc. v. NXP U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IMPINJ, INC., Plaintiff, v. NXP USA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

4:19-cv-03161-YGR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)