From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Idearc Media Llc. v. Kravitz Law Group, P.A.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 1, 2010
CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-2078-T-17-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-2078-T-17-AEP.

June 1, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R R) issued by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on May 7, 2010 (Docket No. 24). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court grant the motion to set aside default (Docket No. 11) and to deem the defendant's answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims (Docket No. 10) to be timely filed.

Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Nettles v. Wainwright , 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc). No timely objections to the report and recommendation were filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia , 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation, May 7, 2010 (Docket No. 24) be adopted and incorporated by reference; the motion to set aside default (Docket No. 11) be granted, the default be vacated, and the defendant's answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims (Docket No. 10) are deemed to have been timely filed. The parties shall have thirty days to file a case management report in this cause of action.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Idearc Media Llc. v. Kravitz Law Group, P.A.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 1, 2010
CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-2078-T-17-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Idearc Media Llc. v. Kravitz Law Group, P.A.

Case Details

Full title:IDEARC MEDIA LLC., Plaintiff, v. KRAVITZ LAW GROUP, P.A., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 8:09-CIV-2078-T-17-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jun. 1, 2010)

Citing Cases

Urrea v. El Tropico Cuban Cuisine, Inc.

Doubts as to whether a default should be vacated should be resolved in favor of a decision on the merits of a…