From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hynes v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1961
13 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

April 10, 1961


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Abrams appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 4, 1960, after a jury trial, as is in favor of plaintiff and against said defendant. Such portion of the judgment is for the sum of $25,000 awarded by the jury's verdict, plus costs. Judgment reversed on the facts, action severed as to said defendant, and a new trial granted as to him, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict against said defendant from $25,000 to $15,000, in which event the judgment as so reduced and insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. The evidence establishes: (1) that as a result of the accident plaintiff suffered an aggravation to a long, pre-existing back condition; and (2) that since the accident, which occurred more than six years ago, plaintiff has continued his work which includes physical labor. Under all the circumstances, it is our opinion that the amount of the jury's verdict is grossly excessive. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hynes v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 10, 1961
13 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Hynes v. Abrams

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT J. HYNES, Respondent, v. FREDERICK I. ABRAMS, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Rice v. Ninacs

In seeking a new trial or a reduction of the verdict defendant argues that "it is a shocking amount in view…