From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hymes v. Procunier

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 1970
428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24231.

August 10, 1970. Rehearing Denied September 16, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Daniel Boone Hymes, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., John T. Murphy, and Timoth G. Laddish, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.


The decision refusing habeas corpus relief is affirmed.

The district court found that the questions presented had been previously decided and rejected by the same court. Of course, the district court can take judicial notice of its own records, and appellant has not brought forward the records of other petitions.

Also, we have trouble finding a substantial federal question in the petition.


Summaries of

Hymes v. Procunier

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 1970
428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Hymes v. Procunier

Case Details

Full title:Daniel Boone HYMES, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Raymond K. PROCUNIER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 16, 1970

Citations

428 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Roberson v. Alameda Cnty.

; cf. also Hymes v. Procunier, 428 F.2d 824, 824 (9th Cir. 1970) (“Of course, the district court can…

Jones v. AT&T

The Court may take judicial notice of public records and reports of administrative bodies, Mack v. South Bay…