From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hydrox Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1937
250 App. Div. 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

March 12, 1937.


Action for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from picketing the places of business of plaintiff's customers. Order denying plaintiff's motion for an injunction pendente lite, without prejudice, and granting defendants' cross-motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, with leave to serve an amended complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. We are of opinion that this is a case involving and growing out of a labor dispute within the provisions of section 876-a, subdivision 10, of the Civil Practice Act, and the plaintiff cannot obtain relief without complying with that section. To the extent indicated, there is no deprivation of the court's jurisdiction. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hydrox Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1937
250 App. Div. 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Hydrox Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:HYDROX ICE CREAM CO., INC., Appellant, v. "JOHN DOE" and "RICHARD ROE,…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

George F. Stuhmer Company v. Korman

We also hold the judgment grew out of or involved a labor dispute within the meaning of the statutes and the…