From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. Chesney Glen Homeowners Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2000
352 N.C. 665 (N.C. 2000)

Opinion

No. 247A00

Filed 6 October 2000

Deeds — Restrictive covenants — architectural review committee — above-ground pool — unreasonable denial

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a subdivision architectural review committee unreasonably withheld approval of plaintiffs' application for permission to construct an above-ground swimming pool where it failed to give plaintiffs notice of valid reasons why the application was denied.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 529 S.E.2d 499 (2000), affirming a judgment entered 15 September 1998 and orders signed 15 January 1999 by Morgan (Michael R.), J., in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 September 2000.

Levine Stewart, by Michael D. Levine, for plaintiff-appellants.

Jordan Price Wall Gray Jones Carlton, PLLC, by Henry W. Jones, Jr., and Hope Derby Carmichael, for defendant-appellee.


The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in Judge Hunter's dissenting opinion.

REVERSED.

Justice PARKER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Hyde v. Chesney Glen Homeowners Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 2000
352 N.C. 665 (N.C. 2000)
Case details for

Hyde v. Chesney Glen Homeowners Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 2000

Citations

352 N.C. 665 (N.C. 2000)
535 S.E.2d 355

Citing Cases

Martin v. Landfall Council of Ass’ns, Inc.

We do not believe Defendant acted in a fashion that calls into question the propriety of their imposition of…