From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, Ohio

U.S.
Apr 1, 1985
471 U.S. 1004 (1985)

Summary

finding infringement by a defendant who neither "analyze[d] . . . [nor] improve[d]" the work, noting that "the preamble to Section 107 indicate fair uses are those that contribute in some way to the public welfare."

Summary of this case from Basic Books v. Kinko's Graphics Corp.

Opinion

No. 84-832.

April 1, 1985.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 949.


Summaries of

Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, Ohio

U.S.
Apr 1, 1985
471 U.S. 1004 (1985)

finding infringement by a defendant who neither "analyze[d] . . . [nor] improve[d]" the work, noting that "the preamble to Section 107 indicate fair uses are those that contribute in some way to the public welfare."

Summary of this case from Basic Books v. Kinko's Graphics Corp.

upholding convictions of a bank president and a mortgage loan officer finding they made false entries in bank's records

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ortiz

adopting the federal standard of review for petitions alleging ineffective assistance of counsel claims in Nevada

Summary of this case from McKague v. Warden

applying City of Lafayette to find antitrust immunity for municipal solid waste services monopoly created pursuant to "clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed policy"

Summary of this case from SSC Corp. v. Town of Smithtown

setting out factors which district court should consider when ruling on motion to withdraw guilty plea and holding that district court ruling on withdrawal motion must be accorded "broad discretion"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Brewer

noting that the fourth factor may not favor copyright owner when the secondary user "profits from an activity that the owner could not possibly take advantage of"

Summary of this case from American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc.

noting that the fourth factor may not favor copyright owner when the secondary user "profits from an activity that the owner could not possibly take advantage of"

Summary of this case from Blanch v. Koons
Case details for

Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, Ohio

Case Details

Full title:HYBUD EQUIPMENT CORP. ET AL. v. CITY OF AKRON, OHIO, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 1, 1985

Citations

471 U.S. 1004 (1985)

Citing Cases

New Era Publications v. Carol Pub. Group

And, "[w]here the district court has found facts sufficient to evaluate each of the statutory factors, an…

Rubin v. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Rubin argues that the Sampson doctrine has fallen into disfavor, see 3 Melville B. Nimmer David Nimmer,…