From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hux v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-1306

09-28-2012

DAVID HUX, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2012, after the Plaintiff, David Hux, filed an action in the above-captioned case seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner's final determination disallowing a claim for Supplemental Security Income Benefits, and after cross-motions for summary judgment were submitted by the parties, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation,

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 10) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Chief Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 14) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

____________________

Gary L. Lancaster,

Chief United States District Judge
cc: Lisa Pupo Lenihan,

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Hux v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Hux v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HUX, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-1306 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Delgado-Ortiz v. Berryhill

"The findings of a consultative examination cannot be disregarded solely on the ground that they are based on…