From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutnik v. Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 2007
37 A.D.3d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 314.

February 22, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered September 28, 2005, which denied petitioner's police officer's application to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees denying petitioner accident disability retirement benefits, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, P.C., Lake Success (Chester P. Lukaszewski of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.


The statutory presumption in petitioner's favor that his cardiomyopathy is service related (General Municipal Law § 207-k) was rebutted by credible evidence that petitioner, contrary to the opinion of his doctor, does not suffer from hypertension, and the absence of any evidence, or indeed claim, of any other possible cause for the condition ( see Matter of Vallas v Safir, 304 AD2d 353; Matter of Seldon v Kelly, 21 AD3d 840).


Summaries of

Hutnik v. Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 2007
37 A.D.3d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Hutnik v. Raymond

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN HUTNIK, Appellant, v. RAYMOND KELLY, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 22, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1479
830 N.Y.S.2d 138

Citing Cases

Matter of Roldan v. Kelly

The Heart Bill creates a presumption that a disabling or fatal heart condition "suffered by a New York City…

In Matter of Collins v. Kelly

The Heart Bill creates a presumption that a disabling or fatal heart condition "suffered by a New York City…