From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchins v. Sperling

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1957
316 P.2d 589 (Okla. 1957)

Opinion

No. 37354.

March 12, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 28, 1957. Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 15, 1957.

Appeal from District Court of Comanche County; Toby Morris, Judge.

Action in the nature of ejectment to recover the possession of real property. Defendants cross-petitioned seeking specific performance of an agreement to convey said property. Judgment for the plaintiffs; defendants appeal. Appeal dismissed.

Fletcher S. Riley, Oklahoma City, Jay D. Jones, Duncan, Charles G. Ozmun, Lawton, for plaintiffs in error.

Godlove Cummins, Ralph H. Cline, Lawton, for defendants in error.


The record reveals that the order overruling the plaintiffs' in error motion for new trial was entered November 30, 1955. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this Court May 8, 1956. On January 21, 1956, an order was entered extending the time in which to perfect an appeal until March 1, 1956. Thereafter, on February 27, 1956, a second order was entered extending the time until April 30, 1956, both to make and serve case-made and to file appeal. The case-made, after service and notice, was finally settled on April 23, 1956. No further order extending the time in which to appeal is contained in the case-made.

It is apparent that this Court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine this case on appeal. The petition in error was not filed within three months from the date of the judgment or final order or within the time granted by an authorized extension of time in which to appeal. 12 O.S. 1951 § 972[ 12-972]. This is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived by the parties or overlooked by the Court. This Court will, upon its own motion, determine if its jurisdiction has been invoked. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Asendorf, 203 Okla. 263, 220 P.2d 272. If jurisdiction has not been acquired the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

The Court acknowledges the aid of the Supreme Court Commissioners in the preparation of this opinion. After a tentative opinion was written by Commissioner James H. Nease and approved by Commissioners Jean R. Reed and J.W. Crawford, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this Court for examination and report to the Court. Thereafter, upon report and consideration in Conference, the foregoing opinion was adopted by the Court.

CORN, V.C.J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, BLACKBIRD and CARLILE, JJ., concur.

WELCH, C.J., and DAVISON, J., dissent.


Summaries of

Hutchins v. Sperling

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1957
316 P.2d 589 (Okla. 1957)
Case details for

Hutchins v. Sperling

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. HUTCHINS, LULA BELLE HUTCHINS, JOHN M. TETENS AND GWEN L…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 15, 1957

Citations

316 P.2d 589 (Okla. 1957)
1957 OK 57

Citing Cases

MEEK v. WILLIAMS

Hewitt v. Shephard, 205 Okla. 465, 239 P.2d 400, 402; Shepherd v. Herndon, Okla., 398 P.2d 511. The question…

Jones v. Winters

It is elementary that a court should, prior to delving into the intricacies of a suit before it, first…