From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchings v. Hutchings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 15, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Dugan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Following the trial court's decision awarding maintenance and distributing marital property and the entry of an order thereon, defendant moved for reconsideration of the decision, reopening of the record, and resettlement of the order. Essentially, defendant asked the court to reconsider its determination and to make substantive changes in its directives. No appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reconsideration (Rifkind v Rifkind, 39 A.D.2d 561) or resettlement (see, Cohn v Cohn, 100 A.D.2d 528) or from the denial of a motion to set aside or reopen an order following a nonjury trial (see, Leis v Estate of Morris B. Baer, Inc., 29 A.D.2d 547), and this appeal must be dismissed.


Summaries of

Hutchings v. Hutchings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Hutchings v. Hutchings

Case Details

Full title:LAVAUNE HUTCHINGS, Respondent, v. PHILIP J. HUTCHINGS, Appellant. (Appeal…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 971

Citing Cases

Wynn v. Rochester

ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (…

Wee v. United Memorial Medical Center

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reconsider is unanimously…