Opinion
March, 1916.
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Jenks, P.J., dissented, upon the authority of Huscher v. New York Queens Electric Light Power Company ( 165 App. Div. 241).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Huscher v. N.Y. and Queens Elec. Light, Power Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
Huscher v. N.Y. and Queens Elec. Light, Power Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
Huscher v. N.Y. and Queens Elec. Light, Power Co.
Case Details
Full title:Florence E. Huscher, as Administratrix, etc., of William H. Huscher…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1916
Citations
173 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)