From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1956
2 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

December 11, 1956


The parties to this action are in such circumstances that the fixing of alimony, counsel fee and amount of support for the child, may and should await final determination of the action for separation. This will work no hardship and at such time, any award made for any or all of the items will be retroactive. We assume, of course, that defendant will continue to pay $75 weekly, the amount which was fixed in the order of the Domestic Relations Court. Order unanimously reversed, with costs to abide the event, and the questions of alimony, counsel fee and amount of support for the child are left for the trier of the facts. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Botein, J.P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1956
2 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

Case Details

Full title:SARAH M. HURWITZ, Respondent, v. SAMUEL HURWITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Friedman v. Friedman

Pendente lite allowances in matrimonial actions are based on necessity. Where no necessity exists, there is…