From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurley v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Mar 29, 1928
248 Ill. App. 646 (Ill. App. Ct. 1928)

Opinion

Gen. No. 32,139.

Opinion filed March 29, 1928.

Action to recover salary as city employee. Judgment for plaintiff.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles F. McKinley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1927.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, James M. Breen, First Assistant Corporation Counsel, and Francis J. Vurpillat, Assistant Corporation Counsel, for appellant; Francis J. Vurpillat, of counsel on the brief. Anthony J. Schmidt, for appellee.


Reversed without remanding.


Summaries of

Hurley v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Mar 29, 1928
248 Ill. App. 646 (Ill. App. Ct. 1928)
Case details for

Hurley v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:Francis A. Hurley, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Mar 29, 1928

Citations

248 Ill. App. 646 (Ill. App. Ct. 1928)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Hanrahan v. Ames

A photostatic copy of the order which is contained in the record shows this part of the order to have been…

Cashmere Valley Bank v. Pacific Fruit Produce Co.

See Holt v. Bergevin, C.C., 60 F. 1. Lee v. Springer Utton, 73 Vt. 183, 50 A. 809; Hurley v. City of Chicago,…