From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurlbert v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 24, 2015
Case No. 15cv752 AJB (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 15cv752 AJB (PCL)

11-24-2015

GRANT DALE HURLBERT, Petitioner, v. MUNIZ et al., Respondent.

cc: The Honorable Battaglia All Parties and Counsel of Record


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(Doc. 18)

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Petitioner requests the Court appoint counsel to assist him in his habeas case because he is inept to handle legal matters. (Doc. 28.)

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to federal habeas corpus actions by state prisoners. See McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991 (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987) ("The right to appointed counsel extends to the first appeal of right, and no further"); Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996) (noting that there currently exists no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings); Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986). However, courts may appoint counsel for financially eligible habeas petitioners seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 where "the interests of justice so require." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. Whether or not to appoint counsel is a matter left to the court's discretion, unless an evidentiary hearing is necessary. See Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728-30 (9th Cir. 1986) (explaining that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel when the court conducts an evidentiary hearing on the petition). "In deciding whether to appoint counsel in a habeas proceeding, the district court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved." Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).

Here, Petitioner has been able to articulate his habeas claims to this Court. He also has not shown that he is likely to be successful on the merits. Thus, Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: November 24, 2015

/s/_________

Peter C. Lewis

U.S. Magistrate Judge

United States District Court
cc: The Honorable Battaglia

All Parties and Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Hurlbert v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 24, 2015
Case No. 15cv752 AJB (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Hurlbert v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:GRANT DALE HURLBERT, Petitioner, v. MUNIZ et al., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. 15cv752 AJB (PCL) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)