From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Sisco

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 21, 2014
843 N.W.2d 559 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 147335. COA No. 306018.

2014-03-21

Harold HUNTER, Jr., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. David SISCO and Auto Club Insurance Association, Defendants, and City of Flint Transportation Department, Defendant–Appellee.


Prior Report: 300 Mich.App. 229, 832 N.W.2d 753.; 495 Mich. 898, 839 N.W.2d 202.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's November 20, 2013 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE that part of our November 20, 2013 order that denied the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to whether damages for pain and suffering and/or emotional distress may qualify as a “bodily injury” that permits a plaintiff to avoid the application of governmental immunity from tort liability under the motor vehicle exception to governmental immunity, MCL 691.1405 (see Wesche v. Mecosta Co. Rd. Comm., 480 Mich. 75, 746 N.W.2d 847 (2008)).

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in Hannay v. Dept. of Transportation (Docket No. 146763).

The Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Insurance Institute of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Hunter v. Sisco

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 21, 2014
843 N.W.2d 559 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Hunter v. Sisco

Case Details

Full title:Harold HUNTER, Jr., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. David SISCO and Auto Club…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

843 N.W.2d 559 (Mich. 2014)
495 Mich. 960

Citing Cases

Motley v. Sadovskiy

The court also found that it was beyond genuine factual dispute that Sadovskiy had not been grossly…

Mennare v. Ramsden

That is, the trial court properly directed a verdict in plaintiff's favor on the issue whether plaintiff's…