From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2009
2009 Ark. 626 (Ark. 2009)

Opinion

No. CR 09-1162

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2009

Pro Se Petition for Review [Circuit Court of Pulaski County, CR 2008-3393, Hon. Willard Proctor, Jr., Judge]. Petition Dismissed.


In 2008, a jury found petitioner Kendrick Hunter Hunt guilty of possession of a controlled substance, resisting arrest, and misdemeanor fleeing. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. Hunt v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 667. Petitioner, represented by counsel in his appeal, now brings this pro se petition for review of the decision of the court of appeals under our Rule 2-4.

We do not reach the merits of the petition. We do not allow a petitioner to substitute his judgment, concerning whether and how to request a petition for review, for that of his attorney. George v. State, 2009 Ark. 444 (per curiam); Brewer v. State, 371 Ark. 532, 268 S.W.3d 332 (2007) (per curiam). Because petitioner is represented by counsel on appeal, we dismiss his pro se petition without further consideration.

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Hunt v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2009
2009 Ark. 626 (Ark. 2009)
Case details for

Hunt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kendrick Hunter HUNT, Petitioner v. STATE of Arkansas, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

2009 Ark. 626 (Ark. 2009)

Citing Cases

Noble v. State

This court does not allow a petitioner to substitute his judgment concerning whether and how to request a…