From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 1966
183 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 65-818.

March 15, 1966.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Jack A. Falk, J.

Curtis Hunt, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.


By this appeal, we are required to review the propriety of an order denying a motion seeking relief, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It appears that this is the second motion for such relief filed in the trial court by the appellant, and it contains substantially the same grounds as that considered by the court in the original motion and, therefore, no error has been made to appear in the trial court's summarily disposing of same. See: Manning v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 616; Rankin v. State, Fla. App. 1964, 168 So.2d 324.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hunt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 1966
183 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Hunt v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS HUNT, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 15, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Wells v. State

There is also considerable case law to this effect. See Rankin v. State (Fla.App. 1964) 168 So.2d 324;…