From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humphrey v. Ballard

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Aug 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00879 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2009)

Summary

emphasizing that West Virginia's first-degree murder statute enumerates three broad categories of first-degree homicide: " murder by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving; by any wilful, deliberate and premeditated killing; in the commission of, or attempt to commit, arson, rape, robbery or burglary"

Summary of this case from Samples v. Ballard

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00879.

August 25, 2009


ORDER


This is an action for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending are the respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket 9] and the petitioner's Motion to Dismiss respondent's motion [Docket 12]. The action was referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 8, 2009, the Magistrate Judge submitted the findings of fact and recommendation ("PF R") [Docket 15]. The PF R recommended that the court grant the respondent's Motion to Dismiss and deny the petitioner's Motion to Dismiss the respondent's motion. Following the court's order granting the petitioner's Motion for Extension and Enlargement of Time under Rule 6(b) [Docket 17], the petitioner timely filed objections to the PF R on June 8, 2009 [Docket 18].

Having reviewed the petitioner's objections de novo, the court FINDS that they are without merit. Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, DENIES the petitioner's Motion to Dismiss the respondent's motion, and GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.


Summaries of

Humphrey v. Ballard

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Aug 25, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00879 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2009)

emphasizing that West Virginia's first-degree murder statute enumerates three broad categories of first-degree homicide: " murder by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving; by any wilful, deliberate and premeditated killing; in the commission of, or attempt to commit, arson, rape, robbery or burglary"

Summary of this case from Samples v. Ballard

noting that counsel's decision not to argue for mercy before a jury where the theory of the case was actual innocence "did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness, and did not constitute per se ineffective assistance of counsel . . ."

Summary of this case from Samples v. Ballard
Case details for

Humphrey v. Ballard

Case Details

Full title:TERRY HUMPHREY, Petitioner, v. DAVID BALLARD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-00879 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Samples v. Ballard

As has been noted in response to similar claims before this Court, it is not professionally unreasonable…

State v. Hughes

We therefore reject this assignment of error. See Humphrey v. Ballard, No. 2:08-CV-00879, 2009 WL 2762331, at…