From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hulme v. Dunlavey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 27, 1915
150 P. 1054 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4845

Opinion Filed July 27, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Necessity. Where plaintiff in error has failed to file brief as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 187 Pac. ix), and offered no excuse for such failure, the cause will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by McKeown, C.)

Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J.W. Lawter, Judge.

Action by W.W. Dunlavey against Elcie Maud Moore, George W. Hulme, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant George W. Hulme brings error. Dismissed.

Geo. T. Webster, for plaintiff in error.

Swan C. Burnette, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 27, 1913. Neither party has filed a brief, nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. It is evident that the appeal has been abandoned, and the motion of defendant in error to dismiss will be sustained, and cause dismissed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Hulme v. Dunlavey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 27, 1915
150 P. 1054 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Hulme v. Dunlavey

Case Details

Full title:HULME v. DUNLAVEY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 27, 1915

Citations

150 P. 1054 (Okla. 1915)
150 P. 1054

Citing Cases

Treasure State Industries, Inc. v. Welch

The object in Sletten's requiring Welch and Aetna to execute the indemnity bond was only to protect Sletten…

Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Cas. Co.

It is the opinion of this Court that the bond was given only for the benefit of the prime contractor,…