From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughs v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

December 8, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's responses to the appellant's demand for a bill of particulars are sufficiently responsive under the circumstances of this case (see, Cirelli v. Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 A.D.2d 856; Patterson v. Jewish Hosp. Med. Center, 94 Misc.2d 680; affd 65 A.D.2d 553). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hughs v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1986
125 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Hughs v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HUGHS, Respondent, v. EILEEN T. GOLD, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1986

Citations

125 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Ohnemus v. Rosenthal

The plaintiff's further bill of particulars shall be served within 10 days after service upon her of a copy…

City Delivery Sys v. Green's

It appears that plaintiff has furnished defendant with a verified bill of particulars, dated January 29,…