From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Pillai

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-55J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-55J.

August 20, 2007


RE: Dkt. Nos. [11], [14] [18] ORDER


AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2007, after the plaintiff, Robert Hughes, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after Plaintiff filed three motions for a preliminary injunction, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions for preliminary injunction found at Dkt. Nos. [11], [14] and [18] are DENIED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Pillai

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 20, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-55J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Hughes v. Pillai

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HUGHES, Plaintiff v. PUSHKALAI PILLAI, M.D.; J. VISINSKY; A. FOMEL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 20, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-55J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Enoch v. Perry

He offered no evidence that his access to or use of this device is threatened in any way. These admissions…