From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1929
170 N.E. 132 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1929

Decided October 22, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

William J. Hogan, Leonard F. Fish and Thomas J. O'Neill for appellant.

John A. Kelly for respondent.


Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence sufficient to present a question of fact for the jury; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Dissenting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1929
170 N.E. 132 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUSANNA HUGHES, an Infant, by MARY HUGHES, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 22, 1929

Citations

170 N.E. 132 (N.Y. 1929)
170 N.E. 132

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Deutch

June, 1934. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the…

Tagg v. Senner

The evidence justified the inference that the spinach fell from a stand maintained by Tantillo in front of…