From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 7, 2017
156 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

524869

12-07-2017

In the Matter of Derrick HUGHES, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Derrick Hughes, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel) for respondent.


Derrick Hughes, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel) for respondent.

Before: Peters , P.J., Garry , Rose , Clark and Rumsey , JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order, making threats, engaging in violent conduct, engaging in a demonstration, interfering with an employee and rioting. After a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges, and that determination was upheld on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.Respondent concedes, and we agree, that pervasive inaudible gaps in the disciplinary hearing transcript preclude meaningful review. Therefore, the determination must be annulled and the matter remitted for a new hearing (see Matter ofCaldwell v. Annucci, 140 A.D.3d 1248, 1248–1249, 30 N.Y.S.3d 924 [2016]; Matter ofBarnes v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 990, 990–991, 968 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2013], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 855, 979 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2 N.E.3d 929 [2013] ; Matter ofLa Van v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 47 A.D.3d 1153, 1153, 850 N.Y.S.2d 285 [2008] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose, Clark and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 7, 2017
156 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Hughes v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Derrick HUGHES, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 7, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
64 N.Y.S.3d 619

Citing Cases

Pierre v. Annucci

Petitioner contends, among other things, that he was improperly denied witnesses at the hearing. Based upon…

Thompson v. Annucci

Petitioner appears to have raised this issue again at the conclusion of the hearing, but respondent concedes,…