From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huggard v. United Performance Metals, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
Case Number: 1:10cv63 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:10cv63

02-03-2012

James Huggard, Plaintiff(s), v. United Performance Metals, Inc., Defendant(s).


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 28, 2011 (Doc. 63), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 17, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff's motion for substitution (Doc. 54) is GRANTED and the Estate of James Huggard, c/o Maggie Hess, Executrix, is substituted as plaintiff in this litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court


Summaries of

Huggard v. United Performance Metals, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
Case Number: 1:10cv63 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Huggard v. United Performance Metals, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James Huggard, Plaintiff(s), v. United Performance Metals, Inc.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 1:10cv63 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Tinney v. Richland Cnty.

Other courts interpreting Bowman have concluded that "Ohio law provides that a cause of action survives where…