From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson Sheraton Corporation v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2004
C.A. No. 99-10041-MLW (D. Mass. Mar. 12, 2004)

Summary

finding that in order for the protestor to prevail on an allegation of bias and bad faith, it must overcome the presumption of regularity and good faith

Summary of this case from Ksend v. U.S.

Opinion

C.A. No. 99-10041-MLW.

March 12, 2004


ORDER


For the reasons stated in court on March 11, 2004, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The United States's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 14) is ALLOWED.

2. Hudson Sheraton Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 15) is DENIED.

3. Judgment shall enter for the United States.


Summaries of

Hudson Sheraton Corporation v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Mar 12, 2004
C.A. No. 99-10041-MLW (D. Mass. Mar. 12, 2004)

finding that in order for the protestor to prevail on an allegation of bias and bad faith, it must overcome the presumption of regularity and good faith

Summary of this case from Ksend v. U.S.

finding that in order for the protestor to prevail on an allegation of bias and bad faith, it must overcome the presumption of regularity and good faith

Summary of this case from Southern Comfort Builders, Inc. v. U.S.
Case details for

Hudson Sheraton Corporation v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HUDSON SHERATON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 12, 2004

Citations

C.A. No. 99-10041-MLW (D. Mass. Mar. 12, 2004)

Citing Cases

Southern Comfort Builders, Inc. v. U.S.

In 2002, the Federal Circuit stated that "for almost 50 years this court and its predecessor have repeated…

Ksend v. U.S.

In 2002, the Federal Circuit stated that "for almost 50 years this court and its predecessor have repeated…