From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 3, 1931
181 N.E. 895 (Ohio 1931)

Opinion

No. 22509

Decided June 3, 1931.

Insurance — Theft — Policy construed most favorably to insured.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

Messrs. Matthews Matthews and Messrs. Mooney, Bibbee Edmonds, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Marshall Harlan, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the insurance policy involved herein contains language reasonably susceptible to different interpretations and hence will be given the construction most favorable to the assured. Farmers National Bank v. Delaware Insurance Co., 83 Ohio St. 309; Mumaw v. Western Southern Life Insurance Co., 97 Ohio St. 1; Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Jones, 111 Ohio St. 84.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 3, 1931
181 N.E. 895 (Ohio 1931)
Case details for

Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen

Case Details

Full title:HUDSON INS. CO. v. YAMEEN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 3, 1931

Citations

181 N.E. 895 (Ohio 1931)
181 N.E. 895

Citing Cases

Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. v. Rhodenbaugh

Since it did not exclude members of the ground crew nor mechanics assisting in flight testing, working on the…