From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Pooler, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that she was injured when a door at a mall owned by defendants closed too fast, causing her to fall. After a bifurcated trial on the issue of liability, the jury found defendants negligent and returned a verdict in plaintiff's favor. We reverse. Plaintiff's proof failed to establish that there was a dangerous condition or that there was any defect in the door (see, Birdsall v Montgomery Ward Co., 109 A.D.2d 969, 971, affd 65 N.Y.2d 913; Koch v Otis El. Co., 10 A.D.2d 464, 467).


Summaries of

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

Case Details

Full title:CLAIRE HUDDLESON, Respondent, v. UPPER NEW YORK REALTY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

Rice v. Univ. of Rochester

"The fact that a dangerous condition is open and obvious does not negate the duty to maintain premises in a…