From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Martinez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 21, 2024
23-cv-05614-TLT (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05614-TLT

03-21-2024

UMAR ABDUL-SHADEED HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. G. MARTINEZ, et al., Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

TRINA L. THOMPSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 20, 2023, petitioner filed this pro se action in the Southern District of California seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF 1. The case was transferred to this district on October 30, 2023. ECF 3-4. The Court informed petitioner that this action was deficient because he had not signed the petition as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF 5. Petitioner was instructed to submit a signed petition on the proper form within twenty-eight days of the date of the order, or this action would be dismissed. ECF 5. The Court provided petitioner a post-paid return envelope. ECF 5. The deadline has passed, and petitioner has not submitted a signed petition on the proper form. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Because this dismissal is without prejudice, petitioner may move to reopen the action. If petitioner seeks to reopen this action, he must file a motion in this action, requesting leave to reopen this action and accompanied by a signed petition on the proper form. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. ECF 2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Martinez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 21, 2024
23-cv-05614-TLT (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Hubbard v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UMAR ABDUL-SHADEED HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. G. MARTINEZ, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 21, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05614-TLT (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)