From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 20, 2005
Case No. 3:04cv347/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Dec. 20, 2005)

Summary

refusing to extend presumption of collateral consequences to award of sentence credit

Summary of this case from Penty v. Jones

Opinion

Case No. 3:04cv347/RV/MD.

December 20, 2005


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 5, 2005. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1, Pet.) is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 20, 2005
Case No. 3:04cv347/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Dec. 20, 2005)

refusing to extend presumption of collateral consequences to award of sentence credit

Summary of this case from Penty v. Jones
Case details for

Hubbard v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL H. HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2005

Citations

Case No. 3:04cv347/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Dec. 20, 2005)

Citing Cases

Penty v. Jones

Cir. 1986) (refusing to extend presumption of collateral consequences to calculation of gaintime credits);…