From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howland v. Hertz Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 27, 2007
Case No. 8:05-cv-2190-T-24MSS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 8:05-cv-2190-T-24MSS.

March 27, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court sua sponte. On March 7, 2007, this Court entered an Order requiring that Defendant Suryanti show cause why a default judgment should not be entered against her for failure to defend this case. A review of the file reveals that Defendant Suryanti has failed to respond or show cause as to why a default judgment should not be entered against her for failure to defend this case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk is directed to enter default against Defendant Suryanti for failure to defend this case. The Court finds that, in order to enter default judgment, it is necessary to determine the amount of damages and such damages shall be determined during trial of this matter set for April 2, 2007.

DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Howland v. Hertz Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 27, 2007
Case No. 8:05-cv-2190-T-24MSS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Howland v. Hertz Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DALE HOWLAND, Plaintiff, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

Case No. 8:05-cv-2190-T-24MSS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Ferguson v. City of Montgomery

” Howland v. Hertz Corp., 2007 WL 9723639, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2007) (quoting Barrett v. Atlantic…