From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 1981
284 S.E.2d 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

61869.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1981.

Probation revocation. Clayton Superior Court. Before Judge Ison.

Arthur K. Steinberg, for appellant.

Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, for appellee.


1. On October 13, 1978 appellant pleaded guilty to several offenses; pursuant to the provisions of the First Offender Act (Code Ann. § 27-2727 et seq.) he was placed on probation for a period of nine years. On December 12, 1980 a revocation of probation hearing was held; as a result of the hearing appellant's probation was revoked and he was sentenced to 10 years confinement. Howell contends this was error, as the court was not authorized to increase his punishment. The Supreme Court has decided this issue adversely to appellant's contention, State v. Wiley, 233 Ga. 316, 318 ( 210 S.E.2d 790); hence, the enumeration is without merit.

2. In his second enumeration of error appellant contends the trial court erred by failing to credit him with time served on probation. We agree, as does the state. Our Supreme Court has held that "when a probationer is sentenced to serve time in a penal institution for the offense for which he has spent time on probation, that probation time must be credited to any sentence received, including cases involving first offender probation." Stephens v. State, 245 Ga. 835, 837 ( 268 S.E.2d 330) (1980). Accordingly, the case is remanded with direction that appellant be credited with the time served on probation.

Judgment affirmed and case remanded with direction. Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1981.


Summaries of

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 15, 1981
284 S.E.2d 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Howell v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWELL v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 15, 1981

Citations

284 S.E.2d 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
284 S.E.2d 82

Citing Cases

Hillman v. State

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the case remanded with direction that the order of revocation be…

Beasley v. State

As no adjudication of guilt has been made and as no prior sentence has been entered, it is clear that if an…