From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 6, 1920
84 So. 774 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)

Opinion

2 Div. 218.

April 6, 1920.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marengo County; R.I. Jones, Judge.

Wess Howell was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Defendant was charged by affidavit before a justice of the peace with petit larceny of a hog, was convicted, and on appeal to the circuit court the solicitor filed a statement under the statute charging the larceny of a hog of the value of $15. To this complaint defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, along with his plea of not guilty. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, and a judgment rendered finding the defendant guilty as charged, but ignoring the plea to the jurisdiction.

S.W. Compton, of Linden, for appellant.

The complaint filed shows a want of jurisdiction in the justice court, and therefore the circuit court had no jurisdiction, and the appeal should be dismissed. Section 6733, Code 1907; 156 Ala. 89, 47 So. 104; 12 Ala. App. 119, 68 So. 499.

J.Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


The charge as shown by the complaint filed was not within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. Code 1907, § 6733. The jurisdiction of the circuit court in this case is predicated and dependent upon the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. It follows, therefore, that the judgment of the circuit court was a nullity and will not support an appeal. The appeal is dismissed on authority of Martin v. State, 156 Ala. 89, 47 So. 104.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 6, 1920
84 So. 774 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)
Case details for

Howell v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWELL v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 6, 1920

Citations

84 So. 774 (Ala. Crim. App. 1920)
84 So. 774

Citing Cases

Key v. State

The defendant was found guilty and fined $500.00. In Howell v. State, 17 Ala. App. 377, 84 So. 774, the…

Hill v. State

Rather, when a witness testifies on direct examination that he has not committed collateral acts of…