From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 17, 1977
240 S.E.2d 589 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

54793.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1977.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 17, 1977.

Drug violation. Clarke Superior Court. Before Judge Barrow.

Jack H. Affleck, Jr., for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, B. Thomas Cook, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The only enumeration of error in this case is that, after the defendant's counsel invoked the rule of sequestration of witnesses, the nominal prosecutor was excepted from the rule. Under the decision in James v. State, 143 Ga. App. 696, following Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 420 ( 216 S.E.2d 258) and other cases, where the trial court exercises his discretion in allowing a police officer who is the nominal prosecutor to remain in the courtroom based on the district attorney's statement that he cannot fairly and adequately represent the state without such officer's assistance, the discretion of the court in allowing him to remain will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed. Webb and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1977 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 17, 1977.


Summaries of

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 17, 1977
240 S.E.2d 589 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 17, 1977

Citations

240 S.E.2d 589 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
144 Ga. App. 31

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Accordingly, the trial court did not err in excusing the clerk during the trial of Williams' case. 3. It has…

Davis v. State

]" Johnson v. State, 198 Ga. App. 316(4) ( 401 S.E.2d 331). It has long been the law in this State that where…