From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Jul 9, 2014
NO. 12-14-00169-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 12-14-00169-CR

07-09-2014

TROY FONTAIN HOWARD, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 7TH


JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT


SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Troy Fontain Howard pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child, a first degree felony. The trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for thirty years.

We have received the trial court's certification stating that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal." See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a notice of appeal. The clerk's record, which includes the trial court's certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The clerk's record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by Appellant and does not indicate the trial court gave Appellant permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Nor does the clerk's record include any pretrial motions that were filed by Appellant and ruled on by the court. See id.

Based on our review of the clerk's record, the trial court's certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant does not have the right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk's record to determine whether trial court's certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal "if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record." TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

JUDGMENT


NO. 12-14-00169-CR


TROY FONTAIN HOWARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Appeal from the 7th District Court


of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007-0068-14)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.


Summaries of

Howard v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Jul 9, 2014
NO. 12-14-00169-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:TROY FONTAIN HOWARD, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: Jul 9, 2014

Citations

NO. 12-14-00169-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2014)