From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. RJF Financial LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2013
538 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-15392 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01213-GMS

08-20-2013

LESLIE R. HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RJF FINANCIAL LLC, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Leslie R. Howard appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his action alleging that defendant's debt collection efforts violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and an Arizona statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and a summary judgment. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because Howard's action amounted to a forbidden "de facto appeal" of a state court judgment. Id. at 1163-65 (discussing Rooker-Feldman doctrine); see also Henrichs v. Valley View Dev., 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir. 2007) (Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff's claim because alleged legal injuries arose from the "state court's purportedly erroneous judgment" and the relief he sought "would require the district court to determine that the state court's decision was wrong and thus void").

We treat the judgment as a dismissal without prejudice. See Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc., 359 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissals under Rooker-Feldman are for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Kelly v. Fleetwood Enters., Inc., 377 F.3d 1034, 1036 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be without prejudice).

Howard's contentions concerning the district court's denial of his motion to strike Jennifer Ache's declaration are unpersuasive. See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Lozen Int'l, LLC, 285 F.3d 808, 813 (9th Cir. 2002) ("We review for abuse of discretion evidentiary rulings made in the context of summary judgment.").

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Howard v. RJF Financial LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2013
538 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Howard v. RJF Financial LLC

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE R. HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RJF FINANCIAL LLC, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

538 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Garduno v. Autovest LLC

On appeal, Howard was affirmed with no explanation other than the entire suit was properly dismissed because…

Black v. Autovest LLC

The Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the decision on appeal, without detailed analysis, because the "action…